One of the major differences between film and video is the component image itself.
In film, movies create the illusion of movement as single, individual image stills rush rapidly through a back lit environment. The actual film stills are individual photographs, caught on reel a fraction of an instant at a time.
The rapidity of the stills fool the eye: an expensive flip book, really.
Video does not have individual photographic frames. It doesn’t rely on illusion, or the instantaneous freeze of time. Instead, video receives a continuous data feed, magnetically (and now digitally), which gets encoded as a continuous flow. Motion is captured at a level of actuality, though itself translated into waves.
I’m sure there’s many a thesis out there on the dichotomy. Speaking of flip books–it would be excellent to do an entire MFA exhibition of ’em (or giant ones that require multiple people to flip).
KR S2 E1